Occupy Portland Elder Caucus Meets with the Mayor’s Office to Discuss Police Abuse

Photo by Laurel Arwen

By Lauren Paulson

On May Day, 2012 Portland police abuse was chillingly captured on camera throughout Portland that day.  This resonated with Occupy Portland’s senior group, The Elder Caucus.  Immediately, thereafter, members of The Elder Caucus coalesced with a purpose to address Portland’s problem of police abuse directly with the Mayor’s office.

First, the Elders explored what others are doing to combat the long-standing problem in Portland of police officers killing, beating up and generally causing violence upon the citizens of the city.  Here are some of the organizations monitoring police abuse in Portland:

  • Albina Ministerial Alliance’s Coalition for Justice and Police Reform —  has five articulated goals for Portland police reform.
  • Rose City Cop Watch — works to eliminate or radically change police institutions in Portland, according to their website.
  • U.S. Attorney/Federal Department of Justice  —  in 2011, the Department of Justice announced a federal investigation into whether the Portland police are engaged in a “pattern or practice” of civil rights violations relating to officers’ use of force.  The Civil Rights Division’s Special Litigation section is conducting the review with the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
  • Portland Copwatch is a grassroots, volunteer organization promoting police accountability through citizen action. They have a year-by-year account of all shootings/deaths by Portland Police at their website.
  • Portland Citizens Review Committee — The Portland City Auditor’s Independent Police Review (IPR) division is responsible for the civilian oversight of the Portland Police Bureau.  IPR is monitored and advised by a nine-member Citizen Review Committee (CRC).  In 2011, IPR opened 426 community complaints about police conduct; rude behavior was the most common allegation.  There are 1,000 Portland Police, so that means that on average every other police officer in Portland received a formal complaint in just one year.

It is apparent that Portland Police still have a long way to go even as measured through the Portland City Auditor’s evaluations:  The IPR wanted the bureau to ensure that officers are property trained before using new equipment, and suggested Portland improve its oversight of SWAT teams by allowing regular independent reviews of its training.

That was in 2007.

Five years later, the recommendations have yet to be put in place – one of a number of suggested bureau improvements that have gone unaddressed, according to a recent city audit.

  • Independent Review — outside consultants hired by the City of Portland in June, 2012 presented their review of seven Portland officer-involved shootings between 2004 and 2010 to Portland’s City Council.   Poor coordination and poor training was high-lighted in the report.
  • The Cato Institute — partially funded by the Koch Brothers, The Cato Institute records real-time police abuse.  The purpose of this project is to gather reports of credible allegations of police misconduct so policymakers (and others) can make informed assessments of the nature and circumstances of police misconduct, and consider proposals that can minimize wrongdoing.

In this setting, the Group of Eight Elders met with Amy Ruiz, the Mayor’s Deputy  Chief of Staff on this Wednesday last.  The meeting was friendly and informative.  The Elder’s objective is to set the table for another meeting with Portland Police policymakers.  The City representatives did not appear to view the meetings through the same prism.  They envisioned dialogue and mutual outreach on a more junior level.

Mayor Sam Adams is a lame duck, so the discussion centered around whether anything meaningful will happen when he, along with his staff, will be gone in months.

The discussion then turned to whether Occupy Portland in general and The Elder Caucus in particular can serve as a change agent for the City Police Department.  One of the firewalls is the police department’s union.  Amy instructed that they are an independent entity that controls what sort of meetings will occur with citizens and who, from the police department will attend what meetings.  One sharp senior pointed out that we have friendly dialogue with individual police in the park and elsewhere all the time.  The problem is how to transform that sort of dialogue and information to police people at large.

Portland Police are going to have a Police Training Citizen Advisory Committee.  This will mark the first time that citizens will be involved in Portland Police training.  The importance of this is underscored by the Independent Review mentioned above.  This California based study observed that all too often citizens simply went along with police training that they did not sanction nor agree with.  The new Portland based citizen advisory group will be part of the inauguration of Portland’s new police training facility.

The next step is how to coordinate the next meeting to include the police in attendance.  Following the 45 minute meeting, the Elder Caucus agreed to report back to Occupy Portland on the results and discussion of issues at this meeting.

Government counts on citizens not following-up on meetings such as this.  But, Elders have a long memory.

Photo by Paul

Share this article...Share on Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Share on Reddit
Email this to someone

  4 comments for “Occupy Portland Elder Caucus Meets with the Mayor’s Office to Discuss Police Abuse

  1. Amy Ruiz
    July 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM

    Re: “Amy instructed that they are an independent entity that controls what sort of meetings will occur with citizens and who, from the police department will attend what meetings.”

    This is not accurate. Rather, we noted that our labor contract with police officers, coupled with limited resources for overtime pay, would make it difficult to schedule a series of citizen-officer sit downs. Our challenge would be choosing between taking officers away from responding to calls for help while on duty, or paying them overtime to attend something like this after a shift. As I’m sure you can appreciate, that’s a difficult choice.

    • paulcone
      July 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM

      Amy, why is meeting with citizens considered not essential duty, and instead “overtime”? Shouldn’t meeting with the community be that “community policing” we’ve heard about for years, and part of the officers core mission?

      Also I can’t help but note that you say the City has limited resources for overtime pay, yet somehow managed to find $1 million to pay overtime for Occupy-related events.

  2. ACAB
    July 28, 2012 at 6:37 PM

    Hey Amy – didn’t realize you were a reader of the Occupier. Since we have your attention, do you mind addressing the main point of the article – which was that cops are basically immune from any kind of disciplinary action? For example, Officer Jon Andonian was clearly captured on May Day punching protesters in the face, unprovoked (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9erzctTxwg&feature=player_embedded). Would you mind telling us what kind of review or disciplinary action has been launched in response? I’m sure you can’t, because the city protects dirty cops.
    (Note from the Editors: We have agreed against publishing ad hominem attacks in our comments section and thus struck the last two word sentence from this comment.)

  3. Inga
    August 8, 2012 at 1:54 PM

    Lauren – the fact that three staff of the mayor’s office were present at the meeting and that Amy Ruiz asked many clarifying questions, should have been mentioned as an indication of their serious interest. I had the impression that the Elder Caucus’ open ended proposal for ongoing dialogue was communicated in the interaction / discussion and that especially Clay Neal understood our intent. Even when the Elder Caucus initiative does not neatly fit into established processes of city government, there seemed to be a general willingness to continue and seek a way for making it work. Bureaucratic institutions [this is not an indictment but a description] tend to set up systemic methods that often cannot readily absorb change and indeed become resistant to it. The mayor’s staff showed a willingness to accommodate the Elder Caucus proposal for the time being. Time will tell whether the city & police as institutions and Occupy Portland as a movement are able to support ways that lead to a culture change in the police force. which

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *